Norbert Gombos vs Miguel Damas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

As two contenders prepare to face off on the tennis court, the numbers provide compelling insights. Can Damas’ proficiency in saving breakpoints give him an edge? In the last six months, he's successfully fended off a noteworthy 55.52% of breakpoints, surpassing Gombos, who has defended 52.52%. Such statistics become invaluable during high-stakes situations where pressure mounts.

When evaluating performance on second serves, who holds the advantage? Damas has secured 40.72% of points from his second serve in recent form, whereas Gombos has captured 45.52%. This higher percentage might suggest an upper hand for Gombos, considering the critical role second-serve effectiveness plays in securing victories.

Examining return games, Damas' agility is evidenced by winning 46.73% of opponents' second serve returns, slightly trailing Gombos, who at 48.19%, shows a marginal edge. Yet, when the focus shifts to first serve returns, Damas dominates with 32.22%, overshadowing Gombos’ 27.65%. This could tip the balance in his favor during moments when rapid reactions are crucial.

Surface preferences can be decisive. Both players exhibit a penchant for clay, with Damas boasting a 60% win rate (146/99) on this terrain, closely followed by Gombos at 58% (268/191). Their lesser performances on indoor hard (0% for Damas) and grass (39% for Gombos) hint at potential vulnerabilities should conditions vary.

A journey through the past year reveals Damas with a 59.26% match victory rate (48/33) slightly leading over Gombos’ 55.93% (33/26). These figures paint a portrait of consistency from Damas, possibly positioning him as the more reliable contender over longer tournaments.

A contender's experience level helps set the stage. Damas thrives in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K domain, winning 68.52% of matches (37/17), while Gombos competes more frequently in the Challengers/ITF > $10K events, securing 56.86% of his matches (29/22). The disparity in competition level could have implications for match dynamics.

Who performs better in deciding sets? Over the past 12 months, Damas has shown remarkable resilience in tight situations, clinching 59% of deciding sets, whereas Gombos has achieved a lower 54%. These figures are particularly intriguing for those eyeing live match predictions.

If breakpoint conversion is indicative of seizing opportunities, Damas again holds the upper hand, converting 38.73% of chances as opposed to Gombos’ 35.85%. Every chance to break an opponent’s serve could spell the difference between victory and defeat. Based on these comprehensive stats, Damas seems poised to emerge as the frontrunner, with crucial advantages that could steer the match in his favor.